1.3k kharmanskyi

os-say-simple Skill

>- 当用户要求把说过或写下的内容说得更简单或更短时——"简单点说""这是什么意思""我没看懂你的回答""太长了""等等,啥?"——涉及任何文本、任何语言都必须调用此技能:你自己的回答、报告、评审意见、报错信息。"我不明白该做什么"请用 os-step-by-step;此技能只负责改写文本。它面向不读代码的读者改写:先说重点,保留所有数字、警告和注意事项——不添加事实,不删坏消息。要求更短时,返回的点数正好等于指定的数字,按重要性排序。

安装方式:把技能目录放入 ~/.claude/skills/(Claude Code)或在 claude.ai 设置中启用;也可复制右侧安装命令一键添加。

查看源码

技能指令原文(SKILL.md)

os-say-simple

A text exists and the user cannot use it. This skill rewrites it into words
they can act on - the pack's rescue skill: the others fire at moments of work,
this one whenever any text, including your own, needs saying again properly.
It changes only the words. Never the facts.

Language

Write in the language the user speaks in this session. Detect it from the
conversation. Keep code, file names and identifiers in English.

When to use

  • The user asks for simpler or shorter, in any phrasing: "say it simply",

"in plain words", "what does this mean", "I don't understand", "too long",
"wait, what?", "bro".

  • The user pastes text and asks what it says.
  • The user gives the skill a number - they want exactly that many points.

Not this skill:

  • "Is this true?" is verification - os-check-work; a restatement stays

exactly as true as its source.

  • "What do I do?" right after an answer that asked the user to act is a

walkthrough - os-step-by-step. Asked about the road ahead, it is
os-whats-next.

What text to restate

  1. Whatever the user points at: pasted text, a named file, a report in the

reports folder. Read it if it is a file.

  1. Nothing pointed at: your own last substantial answer. A bare "wait, what?"

always means the thing you just said.

The controlled-language rules

Drawn from the ideas behind ASD-STE100, the Simplified Technical English
standard from aerospace manuals. This pack follows the ideas; it does not
claim conformance to the standard.

  • One sentence, one idea. In instructions: one action per sentence.
  • Active voice. Name who does what - "the check refused the deploy", never

"the deploy was refused".

  • Short sentences. A sentence that needs a breath in the middle is two.
  • One word, one meaning - and one meaning, one word. Never rotate synonyms

for the same thing; the reader will assume the difference is meaningful.

  • Present tense unless the time itself is the fact.
  • Lists over dense paragraphs - but a list is not permission to drop the

connections between items.

These rules shape every restatement - and when a term has to stay (rule 6),
the sentences around it obey them with the term kept exact.

With a number

3 means exactly three points. Most important first, one sentence each.

  • Fewer real points than asked for: give the real ones and say the source

holds no more. Never pad.

  • A warning or a risk is always one of the points. It outranks good news.

Hard rules

  1. Add nothing, drop no bad news. Every warning, risk, number and caveat

in the source survives the rewrite. A summary that loses the ⚠ line is a
lie by omission. Security, data loss and anything hard to undo are spelled
out in full, never shortened.

  1. Numbers stay exact. No rounding money, counts or dates. A ticket or

pull request number that names an action stays.

  1. As true as the original, no truer. The source's claims stay claims:

"the report says the tests pass", not "the tests pass" - unless this
session verified it. Offer os-check-work when the user needs true.

  1. Unclear stays unclear. Where the source is ambiguous, say "the

original does not say" - never resolve ambiguity by guessing.

  1. Lead with the point. No preamble, no "here is a simpler version" -

the first line is already the answer.

  1. A term with no plain equivalent gets described by what the user would

see or do, with the term once in brackets - same move as the whole pack.

  1. Code and commands are exact strings. Never paraphrase what someone

would type or run; explain around it.

  1. Aim for half the length or less - except where rule 1 or an exact-N

request forbids it.

Known gotchas

  • "I don't understand" about your own answer is feedback, not an attack.

Restate; do not defend, do not re-explain at the same altitude, do not pad
the restatement with justification.

  • Restating is not editing. If while restating you notice your original

was wrong, that is a correction - say so plainly. Never fix it silently
inside the "simpler" version.

  • Mid-task "wait, what?" - restate, then continue the task. Do not lose

the thread the question interrupted.

  • A text that is already plain gets one line saying so and nothing else.

Manufacturing a different version to look useful is padding.

  • No number given, long source - the one-screen rule from the rest of the

pack applies: about ten lines, fifteen at the ceiling.